4.03.2009

Module #5: Plagarism & the Demise of Critical Thinking

Many colleges are developing plagiarism programs, action plans, and many higher education conferences are devoted to the issue. There are even scholarly journals dedicated to the subject.

Online dissertation writing services abound. Or you can simply download a term paper , or spend $20/page for a custom paper from the Internet. Some Internet essay providers even use the word, "cheat" in their business name. Even sneak peaks at the GMAT and the SAT are for sale. It should come as no surprise that YouTube has videos showing students how to cheat with a Coke bottle. Or that cell phones with cameras can be used to cheat on an exam.

It shouldn't be surprising that cheating is on the increase in schools, as well as the Internet sites that provide plagiarism services. Students aren't the only problem, sometimes faculty members fail to monitor academic dishonesty.
Dr. Howard Gardner, better known for his "multiple intelligences" theory, is now focusing on the deleterious effects of not doing good work in our jobs. In conversations he had with people working in various fields, he found that everyone
... knows the difference between what is ethical and what is not, but the disturbing thing is how many people said they cannot afford to do the right or honest thing if they want to get ahead in their careers. He says there is a tension between the people they want to be and the people they think they need to be to succeed.
The results of these conversations have been compiled into a "Good Work" project. More reactionary responses to rampant plagiarism include a plethora of software teachers can use to find key phrases in a student's research paper that are linked to known plagiarized material. The most popular software are listed below.

Keepin' it Current

Back in the day, "newspaper clipping" services would hire people to read through hundreds of publications, looking for specific research topic, and compile lists of summaries of these articles for other researchers to access when they were looking for current materials associated with an ongoing research project. Today, the Internet offers so much information that it is impossible for anyone to stay on top of all of the postings uploaded every day. So electronic versions of "clipping projects" have come online in the past few years to help Internet users sift through all of the webpages of interest.

Most newspapers offer a summary of the daily articles on the first or second page of the publication. RSS ("really simple syndication") feeds do the same thing online. For example, the Department of Education has an RSS feed that summarizes current agency events and announcements. Many newspapers offer educational RSS feeds as well. When RSS feeds first started coming out, people needed a software program called an "aggregator" to translate the feeds into readable articles. Today, most Web browsers have aggregators as an add-on applications, so you can read them the same way you would for a web page.

So many RSS feeds exist now, that it can take the whole day just to read through the summaries. Enter one of the best educational technology innovations in 2008, where RSS feeds are "mashed up," or sifted through for keywords that the user is interested in finding in articles. Let's look at my Yahoo pipe as an example of a mashup.

3.27.2009

Module #4: To Boldly Go Where..., Well, You Get the Picture

WebQuests


Escaping the dusky textbook


So far, we've looked at online educational resources and the nature of "educational social software." Blogs and wikis are by far the most common ESSs used by teachers today. Another genre predates the ubiquitous Web 2.0, the WebQuest. It dates way back to the 1990s, a time when Kathy Schrock owned the educational Internet. What is a WebQuest? Here's a definition:
A WebQuest is an inquiry-oriented activity, where some or all of the material a student interacts with comes from the resources on the Internet. WebQuests eliminate the need for a student to search, sometimes endlessly for information on a topic, since prescreened links are provided in the WebQuest. Another benefit to using WebQuests is that they are easily created and support any curriculum topic. They are motivating and highly interactive, allowing students to use real life resources that are up to date.
WNET has an excellent online workshop about WebQuests. You might even be able to get professional credits for viewing it. Bernie Dodge's WebQuest About WebQuests is another good example, showing how to design roles for each of the students.

Educators need to view the WebQuest in two ways: how to design and evaluate it, the other is what each step of a WebQuest will look like to a student. Let's look at the final product first.

Instead of writing traditional text with links to click on, WebQuests are decidedly nonlinear, and take a constructivist approach to learning. Usually, the quest is divided in the following sections:
Students typically complete WebQuests in cooperative groups. Each student in each group has a specific research role. Let's look at one of mine, and see how they work.

Creating online inquiry


Framing student exploration


So we're back at the main issue of this colloquium: how to create educational writings that aren't like dusty books, that are more than static lists of information. Creating a storyline line for students to move back and forth through, allows students to learn at their own pace, a hallmark of differentiated instruction. Students searching out what they are specifically interested in, while keeping the focus and objectives of the online research intact is the goal of any successful WebQuest.

Building a WebQuest is easier than you may think. It's important to gather all the materials you want to include in the online lesson before you organize it into the above steps. Here are some additional resources to help you craft your WebQuest:

Evaluation


Homework #3

Let's recap what we've done, or should have done, by now:
  • Each group searched ERIC for relevant education articles (and APA citations) that relate to their lesson plan.
  • Each group uploaded their content area, relevant standards, Aim, ERIC summaries/citations to their wiki page.
  • Each group found 3-6 Internet lesson plans/Websites similar to their own lesson plan, and uploaded their results and summaries to their wiki page.
  • Each group completed the Blog WebQuest and uploaded their answers to their wiki page.
  • Each student posted a comment to this blog, identifying 3 kinds of ESS software listed in the "7 Things You Should Know About..." resource, and describing how you might implement them in your classroom.
  • Each group has created a lesson plan, using the Lesson Plan Template.
  • Each group has created several Regents based assessment questions to use during the Summary part of the lesson.
And now for today's homework.

Deliverable #1: Each group will use the materials they have gathered so far to develop a WebQuest. To do so, please follow the below steps:

  1. Search for Web-based content that applies to your lesson plan (please use more than Google).

  2. Organize the Introduction, Task, Process, Evaluation, Conclusion, and Teacher Page from your Internet materials, using one of the following templates if it helps.

  3. Use an online resource to generate your WebQuest. The best free one is filamentality, another one is Quests 2 Teach. If you prefer to save your WebQuest to disk, you can use aclearn.net, seneca, or teach-nology.

  4. As an alternative to #3, I am using Quest Garden to design my WebQuests. If your group would like to use my password to access the website, let me know, and we'll work something out.

That's It!

3.13.2009

Module #3: Classroom Assessments

Finishing Up: How can we know students learned the lesson?

Here is what each group should have completed so far:

  • 150 word summary of your research for your lesson plan, including
    1. NYS Standards – Make sure to include Key Ideas and Performance Indicators
      (Note: use the National or other State Standards if there are no New York State Standards)
    2. How the research informed your lesson plan
    3. How you plan to implement what you learned from your research into your lesson plan
    4. 4 APA Citations

  • Six Website links that have lesson plans similar to one you created, and descriptions that will be added to our link list.

  • Complete the Online Collaborative Writing Project, which will help your group define the words, "blog," and "wiki."
    1. Common Blog Features
    2. Blog Characteristics Sheet
    3. Blogger Planning Sheet
    4. Process Rubric Sheet

  • Adding content to the Wikispace webpage, including
    1. 150 word summary
    2. Lesson Plan Websites
    3. Lesson Plan Websites
    4. Definitions of Blogs and Wikis

Lesson Plan Templates


Avoiding the rush to insanity


There are wikis , online generators, Excel spreadsheets, and webpage lists on lesson plan templates. We will use my simple Lesson Plan Template to help build your lesson plans. All you need to do is type or copy/paste your information into the template, and save it. That's it!

Writing Regents Questions


How do we know our students know
what we know we taught them?


The best way to find Regents questions appropriate to your lesson plan is to go online to the Regents archive and find the appropriate subject matter.
Let's say we wanted to create some Science Regents questions for Grade 4. First, we would find a recent exam, and access the Rating Guide for that exam. Go to the next to last page of the document (page 17), and look at the item map that links each question in the test to relevant standards. Let's say my lesson applied to Standard PS 5.1. Question 9 is appropriate for that standard. So let's download the Spring 2007 Grade 4 Science Regents Exam and create a question that we can save as a Word document.

Looking at Question 9, we can see that we need to create a question format, a graphic format, and an answer format. Open up the final document to see what we will be making.


Homework

Each group will create 5 Regents based questions that apply the New York standards appropriate to that lesson, using the techniques modeled in class.

3.06.2009

Module #2: Collaborative Writing

What is the 21st Century Research Paper?


Deconstructing text


Writing the Body Electric


So you've done your research in a traditional sense, searching and finding several educational articles on the ERIC database about your Aim, APAed them for future reference, summarized them for later use. But that's only the first step, now we face the more perplexing question: How should lesson plans be written for digital natives?

How can we write a lesson that will connect with students with "continuous partial attention"? In the era of Twittering, IMing, and Facebook, writing a letter to a friend, or even an classrom essay with a pen and paper seem strangely archaic. Traditional production of meanings, teacher-assign/student-write/teacher-evaluate are evolving into more fluid, permeable scriptings.

Implementing current technologies into the classroom is an excellent way to experiment with developing successful lessons. Educause's Learning Initiative's 7 Things You Should Know About... offers a wonderful resource to keep current with the ever evolving educational/technological landscape. The "Horizon Report" is another annual resource that describes current trends in educational technologies.

All of these new Internet based applications are categorized as "social software." In an educational setting, these technologies are redefining what "text" means. Our understanding of the act of writing has been altered -- instead of an author, friends post to bulletin boards, learning from each other, developing cumulative understandings of a body of knowledge. Open source, "collaborationware," or educational social software, ("ESS"), sometimes called "c-learning,"can create student-centered approachs to learning. Implementing technology in the classroom, therefore, requires finding ways for students to use ESS as a tool for learning.

But let's look at the most common expressions of ESS: the blog and the wiki.


"We Have Liftoff..."



Look up and see the new atmospheric layer: the blogosphere. The Weblog, or "blog," like the education blog you're reading right now, allows instructors a low-cost publishing alternative, as well as an immediate connection with his or her students. Students can write responses to classroom questions quite quickly in a virtual extension of the classroom. It's easy for professors to find the responses (no stack of papers hiding the desk) and evaluate students almost contemporaneously with their writing activities.

So Welcome to the Blogosphere!

There are so many blogs out there that there are now websites that simply compile other educational blog websites. Awards have been given for the best ones.

So Blog On!


Writing Wikis


A common use of the electronic bulletin board is to compile massive lists of everything. Although helpful, you can never be too sure that these kinds of Web pages aren't collecting digital dust with broken links. A deeper use of social software develops collaborative writing projects. Wikis allow students to easily create and edit their own writings, and create links to other web pages.

Many educators use pbwiki and edublog to host their web pages. To learn more about blogs and wikis, several online resources and seminars are available to help educators get comfortable using wikis. Their most important function is to share information about a specific topic, like lesson plans, by anyone who is willing to upload their work, to anyone who is interested in downloading the information. For example, here are several lesson plan wikis:
These wikis could easily be simply called websites as well, but the most important quality of wikis, again, is that many people contribute and edit the online content. Of course, the best wikis are the ones we write ourselves. My classes, collectively, have been building what, in my opinion, is the best lesson plan reference page on the entire Internet. All of you will be contributing to it as well. So let's get on with it.

Evaluation


Homework #2


Deliverable #1: Each group will upload their Homework #1 research to their group's wiki page.

Deliverable #2: Each group will find either 3 lesson plan Websites that offer multiple lesson plans in the groups content area and are not already on the lesson plan wiki, or 6 Internet lesson plans that directly relate to the group's Aim. Combinations of the two options are permitted. An Internet lesson plan on fractions is not appropriate to an Aim about factoring. Each lesson plan reference will include a hyperlink, and a few sentences describing why this is a good lesson plan for your Aim. Please use the bulleted web sites above as a starting point to finding your lesson plan web sites.

Deliverable #3: Each group will access the Blog WebQuest to fill out the remainder of questions on their group's wiki page. Students only have to :
  1. Reference/read the 'content material' resources to collectively come up with definitions of "blog" and "wiki."
  2. Determine a way their lesson plan can use a blog or wiki during instructional delivery of the lesson.
Deliverable #4: Each student will post a comment to this blog, answering the following question:
  • Referring to the "7 Things You Should Know About..." resource, identify 3 kinds of ESS software listed in the resource, and describe how you might implement them in your classroom.

2.06.2009

Module #1: Educational Research

How can we teach with technology?


Preface:


Diverting students from the virtual gingerbread house


Today's youth are often more skilled with computers than us, their teachers. Within the fickle, flickering attentions of the adept tweenster, "everybody has MySpace." As "digital natives," our youth are easily enticed into gingerbread homepages, aglaze with hypertext, rife with meaningless content. Our job as educators is to create opportunities in the virtual world that enhance learning. For example, we can give students permission to read and write their own questions, organize events with other students, live a Second Life, even use avatars to define their own identity. To many of us, born before the net generation, the classroom was a grid of students sitting in rows and columns, reading the next chapter out of a book written by educational authorities. Today's student reads in a completely different manner, using non-linear hypertext to make the reading experience more pleasurable. * Hence the dilemma: designing lessons in the future will be radically different than the lessons our teachers created, requiring today's teachers to integrate current technology into the classroom, like email, if we want pique our students' curiosities.

Too often, students are left to their own plugins in the digital classroom. Many teachers prefer to apply research techniques they used when they were students: walking up a library's marble steps, drifting down dusty bookshelves, the "shushers" behind the desk not so hip as they are today. Some educators, as "digital immigrants," can offer little more guidance than how to log on, or print out a page, adrift in a digital sea of online research. We all know the result, schools fine students for cell phone use in class, place "filters" which shut out everyone except the kids who were misusing the computers in the first place, or even banning computers altogether from the classroom.

Upgrading our educational toolbars

Even if educators are relegated from the "sage on the stage," to the "guide on the side," we cannot abandon our fundamental imperative: framing inquiry in the digital classroom. Without an overarching, organizing pedagogy, students will be tempted to do what you're probably thinking about, or doing right now: check your email while I'm delivering today's lesson, chat on AIM, shop on eBay. How can we divert students from virtual gingerbread houses? We could wave our hands in frustration, moan that learning is dead, and accept more and more command-and-control ("don't do that") procedures limiting students' Internet access. Or we can create our own "educational toolbars," allowing us to connect with students, helping to ensure students don't paddle down the datastreams of misinformation, mind-numbing waste, and obscenity so common on the Internet.

Interactive Writing


Let's jump "write" in to a common educational technology: the educational blog, or edublog. Do you sometimes wonder if your submitted modules just end up in a stack of unread papers somewhere? Even if your suspicions are unfounded, it's difficult to know if anyone's actually reading and appreciating the hard work you invested into producing a well written paper. The term paper will always be a important component of course evaluations, but interactive writing, the kind that gets created quickly, and read by your peers and instructors almost as quickly, offers an immediacy to written communication unrivaled by more formal term papers. Blog postings are instantaneously uploaded to the Internet, in full view for anyone to look at. Knowing your writing will be exposed to anyone's eyes can enhance a student's accountability for his or her writing – knowing that your peers will be reviewing your writing, and not just your teacher at some unknown future date, may make you write more carefully.

You're reading an edublog right now. My blog. My rantings on online educational technologies. And others. If you click on the blue words in my writing, you will be wisked away to other web pages that offer more information on the word. Remember to click on your browser's 'Back' arrow (the green left arrow at the top left of the screen if you're using the Firefox browser) when you're done reading to return to my blog. Click on the blue 'edublog' word in the previous paragraph, and an eyegrabbing three page magazine excerpt will load into your browser.

So the edublog allows the learner to read and investigate at his or her own pace. If you want to learn more about something I wrote, click on the blue words. If not, read the next paragraph. The edublog is also interactive, allowing readers to post comments and feedback that the instructor can apply to improving his delivery of the lesson.

So let's get interactive...

Remember the commonly used, commonly abused KWL chart? Can you remember a Professional Development session where they weren't discussed? Using the same teaching device over and over again, uninspiredly, defeats their purpose: to enhance learning in the classroom. Let's use the KWL chart in a new way.

Now that you've read my introduction to using educational technologies in the classroom, I'd like each of you to write down your thoughts to the following questions:
  1. What do you Know about educational technologies? (Don't say "nothing," you must have experienced some sort of electronic device in the classroom at some time.)
  2. What do you Want to know about educational technologies? (Imagine yourself teaching five years from now. What devices will help you keep your students actively engaged?)
  3. What have you Learned about educational technologies from reading this introduction so far? (What's the problem stated in the previous paragraphs? What are edublogs?)

Answer these questions by creating a comment to this blog posting. To post a comment, follow these instructions:

  • Open a new tab (Ctrl-t) and load this page a second time. By clicking back and forth on the tabs, you can read the instructions in one tab, and execute the commands in the other.
  • Scroll to the end of this posting, on the line that starts, "posted by terminus," and click on the 'comments' link.
  • On the right side of the screen, type your name in the text box.
  • Answer the questions listed above, under your name.
  • Below the text box, click on the 'Anonymous' radio button.
  • Once you're happy with your answers (remember we're all going to read them in a few minutes) click on the orange 'Publish Your Comment' button below the text box.

Building a Lesson Plan:


Researching Through Internet Resources


Every student who has passed through this colloquium has produced online educational resources. These resources grow and evolve with each class. Online writing should never be a complete process – as soon as you stop revising it, the links grow dusty, break, and produce the dreaded '404 File Not Found' message. Through this class, we, as teachers and students, will collectively experience a pedagogical process that moves beyond the "textbook brick."

Let's start by getting into groups of 2-3 and choosing a content area for a lesson plant that your group will create. Post a comment to this blog that includes:
  1. The names of everyone in your group
  2. Your content area
The group that posts first gets that content area. No two groups will have the same content area.

Here are some lists of familiar "online educational resources" -- links to other webpages of interest, usually unchanging, very similar to a stack of books in a library. These links offer access to New York State educational standards, national standards, and some of the online educational publications on the Internet. It is helpful to cluster educational information that we eternally refer to when writing lesson plans all on one webpage, like the standards codes that align to a lesson.

Evolving away from the recipe page: Search engines


I've been in professional development sessions where the above example is about as far as today's question was developed: a static page of information, reflecting all of the work done in the session, but as soon as the class is over, the page grows old, neither updated or revised, an electronic dusty book. A lot of teachers' web pages are very similar, listing outlines of content, sample exams, student rankings, but never showing what is most important in education: how learning new concepts can reshape our understandings and perceptions of the world around us.

We're all familiar with the ubiquitous term, "Google," or its energy efficient companion, "Blackle." But there are many Web-based search engines available to help you find information that can enhance your lesson plans. More importantly, there are several educational search engines that are gold mines of information for curriculum development. The best, by far, is the Education Resources Information Center, so important that I'm giving the link its own line.


Let see how I have used the ERIC resource to help develop a unit on environmental education.

I am interested in creating "self-guiding walking tours" of the local neighborhood adjacent to the campus where I teach science lab classes. Of course, I set up a blog for the class, but to really fine-tune what I wanted to achieve with the environmental education, and how to assess student learning, I had to begin with the foundation of any good lesson plan, reading educational literature on the subject of instruction.

So I went to the ERIC search engine, typed, "environmental education" in the first box, and, (very important!) checked on the 'Full Text Availability' box, so that I could download the entire document in .pdf format. I clicked on the 'Search' box, and voila! — on the first page of search results was an EPA document titled, "The ABC's of Environmental Education." Besides showing me how to apply for grant funding to get paid for my research, pages 10-12 provided a checklist of step to help me develop my environmental education unit. 3,127 results also appears, so I narrowed the search by adding another term, "urban," to the second box. Now I only had 197 results, still too many for my tired, bleary eyes to sort through, so I added the term, "mapping," since I wanted to develop a community mapping project as part of the unit, and clicked on all of the boxes for post-secondary education in the 'Education Level(s)' box. I now found two articles, narrowly tailored to what I wanted to do in my environmental educational unit.

APA Citation Format


As a first year teacher, I often grabbed whatever information I could find for a lesson, chunked it all together, and once the week was over, forgot about it in collective cloud of oblivion shared by my colleages at the local pub. A year later, I found myself asking the following question many times:
"Where did I find that article?"
Knowing that I had to do it all over again added to the normal "second year darkness," that many teachers experience. To avoid reinventing the wheel, creating a citation for any educational materials we find valuable is an imperative part of curriculum design. Citations include the author's name, the article's title, date of publication, page numbers, name of publisher, and any other relevant information, such as a URL link, that will help us find the article in the future.

Educators usually use the APA Citation Format to memorialize helpful educational articles. Here are some common examples to help create the correct citation format.

Article in Journal Paginated by Issue

Journals paginated by issue begin with page one every issue; therefore, the issue number gets indicated in parentheses after the volume. The parentheses and issue number are not italicized or underlined.

Scruton, R. (1996). The eclipse of listening. The New Criterion, 15(30), 5-13.

Article in a Magazine

Henry, W. A., III. (1990, April 9). Making the grade in today's schools. Time, 135, 28-31.

Article in a Newspaper

Unlike other periodicals, p. or pp. precedes page numbers for a newspaper reference in APA style. Single pages take p., e.g., p. B2; multiple pages take pp., e.g., pp. B2, B4 or pp. C1, C3-C4.

Schultz, S. (2005, December 28). Calls made to strengthen state energy policies. The Country Today, pp. 1A, 2A.

APA Citation Format

Once I began accumulating articles (and citations), I was ready to begin creating what would eventually become my environmental educational unit plan. The first step was to summarize in one or two paragraphs what I learned from each article, and include the APA citation at the top of the summary. By compiling a list of summaries, I was ready to begin the next step, the actual writing of lesson plans. Notice that I included the six digit ERIC code for each citation.

Evaluation


Homework #1


Before leaving this class
, each student will complete the following:

Deliverable #1: Students will form groups of no less than two and no more than three students. Each group will decide which content area (math, science, social science, art, or language arts) they will research for their lesson plans, etc.

Deliverable #2: Each group will choose an Aim for a lesson plan appropriate to the chosen content area.

Deliverable #3: Each group will post a comment to this posting, listing their names, content area, and Aim.

To post a comment, follow these instructions:

  • Scroll to the end of this posting, on the line that starts, "posted by terminus," and clicking on the 'comments' link. On the right side of the screen, type your information in the text box. Below the text box, click on the 'Anonymous' radio button.
  • Make sure your name is at the top of your entry to ensure receiving credit. Also make sure to include:
    • Each person's name,
    • the content area
    • the Aim
Note: Once a group has posted their choice for a content area, no other group may choose that content area.

Before next class, each group will complete the following:

Deliverable #4: Each group will identify the New York State and New York City standards that align to the Aim, using the Educational Standards listed on the class wiki.

Deliverable #5: Each student will use the ERIC search engine to locate 2-3 articles that pertain instruction and delivery of that Aim.

Deliverable #6:
Each group will post a comment that includes their names, their Aim, the NYS and NYC standards, and the APA citations of all of research articles to this blog.

Deliverable #7: Each group will produce a 150 word essay that summarizes
    1. the lesson plan Aim chosen
    2. how the ERIC research articles helped shape the design of your lesson plan
    3. the NYS standards that are applicable to your lesson plan, and
    4. how you plan to implement this lesson plan